GOOGLE HID THIS NEWS. Russian Collusion – Bill Clinton (Holding No Government Position) Met Russians To Close Deal For The Clinton Foundation By Giving Away American Uranium
GOOGLE HID THIS NEWS. Russian Collusion – Bill Clinton (Holding No Government Position) Met Russians To Close Deal For The Clinton Foundation By Giving Away American Uranium.
BY IWB ·
by Ruby Henley
If you listed in basic English on a school blackboard the crimes and evils of the Obama Administration, including in that the Clintons, it could clearly be read out loud to a classroom of students. If you included on that blackboard legitimate sources and facts, you would be giving those students the materials needed to make a legal case against Obama and the Clintons. You could not do more to present the truth to those seeking to learn.
If you did the same with the Trump Administration, you would find that President Trump has made mistakes, but you would not find criminal intention of defrauding the United States of America. You would not find an Administration, who had opened up this Country to illegal immigrants, or defrauded the American people by giving away 20% of their uranium supply on American land.
Nor would you find that President Trump would allow a non-government entity to broker a deal between the United States and Russia, while insuring that his or her enterprise benefits financially from a deal between the governments of the US and Russia. That simply would be collusion between a non-government entity of the US; yet one, who had a wife working as Secretary of State for the US, and the Russian government to defraud the United States of its resources.
A statement was made that “digging up the dirt” research on political opponents was done by all politicians, so the fact that Clinton would try to find dirt on Trump, or Trump would try to find dirt on Clinton is perfectly normal in politics. Thus, Clinton hiring Fusion GPS to dig up dirt on Trump, or Trump Jr. wanting to hear the dirt on Clinton…well, honestly that is politics…plain and simple.
However, after the race has been run and won…the American LEGAL standard is to accept the vote of the American people. That is how it has always been up until Trump won over Clinton. At that time Clinton and others in the Obama Administration DICTATORSHIP took it upon themselves to destroy the legality of the political process that had always withstood the test time in the USA. In fact, that LEGAL standard had been an example to all the world, until the criminal cartel of the LEFT infiltrated the White House.
BOTTOM LINE is – again – the criminal cartel of the LEFT infiltrated the White House when Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton served together as President and Secretary of State in the House of the American people. You see, just as President Trump said in his State of the Union address, the United States of America belongs to the American people.
You see, it is We The People who pay the bills, and you hear President Trump say that over and over again. He has a sincere need to make this Country GREAT/LEGAL again for the American people. He wants the vote of the average American to mean something.
NOW, what does Obama and the Clinton cartel want? They do not care if the American people live or die. In fact, they do not give a second thought to those of us, who were born here, raised here, and shed blood on the battlefield to protect this Country we love!
Further they sought to cheat the United States of America by TREASON against the USA by selling URANIUM rich land to RUSSIA out from under the feet of the American people. Literally, American land was stolen out from under the feet of American people. You are speaking of families losing generational land to…well, you might say the Bureau of Land Management of the United States; but, in fact, you would be wrong. Just as the entire US government was controlled by the Obama and Clinton cartel, so was the agencies in that Administration. You either follow orders, or you lose your job.
NOW, TRUE RUSSIA COLLUSION took place when Williams Jefferson Clinton, representing the US Obama Administration and the Clinton Foundation, which in no way was connected to the US government, met in Russia to broker the Uranium One deal with the Russian government.
The Hill’s latest report states that President Bill Clinton met with then-Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin in 2010 after he sought permission to meet with a board director at Rosatom, Russia’s nuclear energy firm, that wanted to receive “a majority stake in Canadian company Uranium One.”:
“As he prepared to collect a $500,000 payday in Moscow in 2010, Bill Clinton sought clearance from the State Department to meet with a key board director of the Russian nuclear energy firm Rosatom — which at the time needed the Obama administration’s approval for a controversial uranium deal, government records show.
Arkady Dvorkovich, a top aide to then-Russian President Dmitri Medvedev and one of the highest-ranking government officials to serve on Rosatom’s board of supervisors, was listed on a May 14, 2010, email as one of 15 Russians the former president wanted to meet during a late June 2010 trip, the documents show.
“In the context of a possible trip to Russia at the end of June, WJC is being asked to see the business/government folks below. Would State have concerns about WJC seeing any of these folks,” Clinton Foundation foreign policy adviser Amitabh Desai wrote the State Department on May 14, 2010, using the former president’s initials and forwarding the list of names to former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s team.”
The list included Dvorkovich as mentioned above, but also Russian businessman Viktor Vekselberg. The Hill continued:
Two days after Hillary Clinton’s visit to Russia, Vekselberg was named by Medvedev to oversee a new technology investment project called Skolkovo, designed to be Russia’s new Silicon Valley, according to media reports.
Hillary Clinton had directly discussed the Skolkovo project with Medvedev, and her State Department was whipping up support for it among U.S. companies, creating the potential appearance for a conflict. She even attended a major event with the Russians in 2010 to promote the project.
“We want to help because we think that it’s in everyone’s interest do so,” she was quoted as saying at the time.
He met with someone else instead:
Bill Clinton instead got together with Vladimir Putin at the Russian leader’s private homestead.
Here’s another point that will raise eyebrows:
The Clinton friend said the former president’s office then began assembling a list of requests to meet with Russian business and government executives whom he could meet on the trip. One of the goals of the trip was to try to help a Clinton family relative “grow investments in their business with Russian oligarchs and other businesses,” the friend told The Hill.
“It was one of the untold stories of the Russia trip. People have focused on Uranium One and the speaking fees, but opening up a business spigot for the family business was one only us insiders knew about,” the friend said.”
(“Hillary Clinton’s Team!” The reality is you are asking permission from Hillary Clinton/Secretary of State for Bill Clinton/husband of Hillary Clinton, who both own the Clinton Foundation, to profit from selling privately owned American uranium rich land to the Russian government.)
An American businessman who worked for years undercover as an FBI confidential witness was blocked by the Obama Justice Department from telling Congress about conversations and transactions he witnessed related to the Russian nuclear industry’s efforts to win favor with Bill and Hillary Clinton and influence Obama administration decisions, his lawyer tells The Hill.
Attorney Victoria Toensing, a former Reagan Justice Department official and former chief counsel of the Senate Intelligence Committee, said Tuesday she is working with members of Congress to see if they can get the Trump Justice Department or the FBI to free her client to talk to lawmakers.
“All of the information about this corruption has not come out,” she said in an interview Tuesday. “And so my client, the same part of my client that made him go into the FBI in the first place, says, ‘This is wrong. What should I do about it?’”
Toensing said she also possesses memos that recount how the Justice Department last year threatened her client when he attempted to file a lawsuit that could have drawn attention to the Russian corruption during the 2016 presidential race as well as helped him recover some of the money Russians stole from him through kickbacks during the FBI probe.
The undercover client witnessed “a lot of bribery going on around the U.S.” but was asked by the FBI to sign a nondisclosure agreement (NDA) that prevents him from revealing what he knows to Congress, Toensing explained.
When he tried to bring some of the allegations to light in the lawsuit last year, “the Obama Justice Department threatened him with loss of freedom. They said they would bring a criminal case against him for violating an NDA,” she added.
Emails obtained by The Hill show that a civil attorney working with the former undercover witness described the pressure the Justice Department exerted to keep the client from disclosing to a federal court what he knew last summer.
“The government was taking a very harsh position that threatened both your reputation and liberty,” the civil lawyer wrote in one email. In another, she added, “As you will recall the gov’t made serious threats sufficient to cause you to withdraw your civil complaint.”
Justice Department and FBI officials did not return calls seeking comment.
Federal court records from 2014 and 2015 show that a wide-ranging FBI probe into Russian nuclear industry corruption was facilitated by an unnamed American consultant who worked for the Moscow-based nuclear energy giant Rosatom’s Tenex subsidiary on a multiyear campaign to grow Moscow’s uranium business inside the United States.
Those efforts included winning U.S. approval of Rosatom’s controversial purchase of Canada-based Uranium One’s American uranium assets, securing new approvals to sell new commercial uranium to the federally backed United States Enrichment Corporation and winning billions in new U.S. utility contracts for Russian nuclear fuel.
The court records alternatively refer to the FBI informant as “confidential source 1,” the “contractor” and “Victim 1” without ever naming him. The records make clear he came to the FBI immediately after Russian officials asked him to engage in illegal activity in 2009.
Toensing said the confidential witness identified in those court documents is her client.
The Clinton Foundation received millions from those who had a stake in the lucrative uranium deal, including Ian Telfer, the chairman of Uranium One, who has a family charity in Canada called the Fernwood Foundation that has donated money to the Clintons:
His donations through the Fernwood Foundation included $1 million reported in 2009, the year his company appealed to the American Embassy to help it keep its mines in Kazakhstan; $250,000 in 2010, the year the Russians sought majority control; as well as $600,000 in 2011; and $500,000 in 2012. Mr. Telfer said that his donations had nothing to do with his business dealings, and that he had never discussed Uranium One with Mr. or Mrs. Clinton. He said he had given the money because he wanted to support Mr. Giustra’s charitable endeavors with Mr. Clinton. “Frank and I have been friends and business partners for almost 20 years,” he said.
The Clinton campaign left it to the foundation to reply to questions about the Fernwood donations; the foundation did not provide a response.
Mr. Telfer’s undisclosed donations came in addition to between $1.3 million and $5.6 million in contributions, which were reported, from a constellation of people with ties to Uranium One or UrAsia, the company that originally acquired Uranium One’s most valuable asset: the Kazakhstan mines. Without those assets, the Russians would have had no interest in the deal: “It wasn’t the goal to buy the Wyoming mines. The goal was to acquire the Kazakh assets, which are very good,” Mr. Novikov, the Rosatom spokesman, said in an interview.